Dawkinswatch

You are walking for a nice leisurely walk in your local mall area you are approached by two eighteen year olds in white shirts calling themselves elders, seventeen year old elders? Welcome to the surreal world of Mormons but you might ask what has this going to do with evolution? Do you not know that the Church Latter Days Saints are evolutionists?

But at least I would credit them with telling the world exactly what they believe and having worked out what our friends the pseudo scientist have not yet thought about: they want to be gods.

Now let me take this opportunity to ask my friends evolutionist, if you sincerely believe in the evolutionist theory, what will you then evolve into? You cannot surely become a chimp , you have to be more refined than you are currently.

You might need to come to your senses and admit that evolution is a mystery religion which advocates that godhood is in sight, men can evolve into  higher beings. There you are: Evolution has joined the ranks of mystery religion and is now teaching Freemasonic philosophy and Catholism.

What happens why someone claims to be lieve in what they do not know?  Well they becomes easier to be duped.

So why would someone claim that they are an evolutionis when they do not understand it? Well it is fashionable and they want to be part of the “in” crowd. Some have contracted out their brains to would be scientists.  Many of the Dawkinites are young impressionable teenagers who think they have figured life out, at that age we all do.

Now lest you start to say that i am misrepresenting my Evolutionists, I invite you to tell us what Evolution is? 

You are right, in a way the validity of any theory does not depend on whether people can describe it on not but it does shed light on the caliber of the average Darwinian.

It is a theory, it is a theory and it is not reality. When people like Richard Dawkins you can almost believe that they have created life and they have used evolution to make species jump from one form to the other but can we please have a reality check please, science does not know how to create life, let alone make a frog into a man.

It is a theory, it has been oversold over the years but we need to inject a sense of reality into the situation. We need you to shut up and let science speak for you! Please create/invent life from non life, then I will look at you hypothesis is a little bit more respect.

But at this point this is you have not produced any formulas to back up your “Grand Unification Theory.”

Am I being unreasonable just for you for a bit of proof that you know what you are talking about? Maybe Evolution is another Nigerian 419 scam?  I need proof that you know what you are talking about.

You know how they are so eloquent when they are talking about apes being 98 per cent human? You know how good they are telling the world that there is shape shifting, we were once frogs who begot giraffes who begot chimps who begot humans? Is this voodoo science ( do you remember voodoo economics?) or is based on solid laws?

We can test whether these men have lost their marbles or they are, what they dream, that they will one day become i.e. demigods.

Now if Evolution is true why is it that experiments to interbreed chimps and humans have failed? The scientific dictator Uncle Joseph Stalin commissioned Ilya Ivanov to produce strong men by interbreeding men and apes. If what what so called scientists claims were true that would have a walk in the park, but he failed to make the experiments work. I want to drive this point home again they failed to produce half a man and half a monkey.

I smell a rat, no half a rat half a frog. maybe a human being is not 98 per cent chimp after all and maybe evolution is just recycled reincarnation myth?

There you are, Stalin tested the theory of evolution claims but it was found wanting, it was exposed as a myth.

We have established that most Evolutionist fanatics cannot describe the the process of evolution but they make boasts to be great rationalists, so this might be a little tricky.

Now there is something that is called the Scientic Method but if you look at the steps you will notice that Evolution cannot meet the criteria given that it cannot be tested.  Well it should be but then New Atheist will claim that you are anti-science.

The scientific method proves that evolution is bad science, please remember that you have not given us any proof of any fossil which is in-between species and the ones you have given us like Piltdown Man were frauds.

Some of you might do well to remember that you are claiming to be objective but you have long passed over to hooliganisms let alone fanatisms.

Starting Tomorrow we will give you enough concrete reasons why the theory of evolution is a lie.

I could see some of the commentators on here being employed by communist in this fashion. Certainly a Richard Dawkins would have no problem with what Richard Wurmbrand suffered at the hands of the communist black scientists.

Humanist Manifesto I

The Manifesto is a product of many minds. It was designed to represent a developing point of view, not a new creed. The individuals whose signatures appear would, had they been writing individual statements, have stated the propositions in differing terms. The importance of the document is that more than thirty men have come to general agreement on matters of final concern and that these men are undoubtedly representative of a large number who are forging a new philosophy out of the materials of the modern world.

— Raymond B. Bragg (1933)

The time has come for widespread recognition of the radical changes in religious beliefs throughout the modern world. The time is past for mere revision of traditional attitudes. Science and economic change have disrupted the old beliefs. Religions the world over are under the necessity of coming to terms with new conditions created by a vastly increased knowledge and experience. In every field of human activity, the vital movement is now in the direction of a candid and explicit humanism. In order that religious humanism may be better understood we, the undersigned, desire to make certain affirmations which we believe the facts of our contemporary life demonstrate.

There is great danger of a final, and we believe fatal, identification of the word religion with doctrines and methods which have lost their significance and which are powerless to solve the problem of human living in the Twentieth Century. Religions have always been means for realizing the highest values of life. Their end has been accomplished through the interpretation of the total environing situation (theology or world view), the sense of values resulting therefrom (goal or ideal), and the technique (cult), established for realizing the satisfactory life. A change in any of these factors results in alteration of the outward forms of religion. This fact explains the changefulness of religions through the centuries. But through all changes religion itself remains constant in its quest for abiding values, an inseparable feature of human life.

Today man’s larger understanding of the universe, his scientific achievements, and deeper appreciation of brotherhood, have created a situation which requires a new statement of the means and purposes of religion. Such a vital, fearless, and frank religion capable of furnishing adequate social goals and personal satisfactions may appear to many people as a complete break with the past. While this age does owe a vast debt to the traditional religions, it is none the less obvious that any religion that can hope to be a synthesizing and dynamic force for today must be shaped for the needs of this age. To establish such a religion is a major necessity of the present. It is a responsibility which rests upon this generation. We therefore affirm the following:

FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.

SECOND: Humanism believes that man is a part of nature and that he has emerged as a result of a continuous process.

THIRD: Holding an organic view of life, humanists find that the traditional dualism of mind and body must be rejected.

FOURTH: Humanism recognizes that man’s religious culture and civilization, as clearly depicted by anthropology and history, are the product of a gradual development due to his interaction with his natural environment and with his social heritage. The individual born into a particular culture is largely molded by that culture.

FIFTH: Humanism asserts that the nature of the universe depicted by modern science makes unacceptable any supernatural or cosmic guarantees of human values. Obviously humanism does not deny the possibility of realities as yet undiscovered, but it does insist that the way to determine the existence and value of any and all realities is by means of intelligent inquiry and by the assessment of their relations to human needs. Religion must formulate its hopes and plans in the light of the scientific spirit and method.

SIXTH: We are convinced that the time has passed for theism, deism, modernism, and the several varieties of “new thought”.

SEVENTH: Religion consists of those actions, purposes, and experiences which are humanly significant. Nothing human is alien to the religious. It includes labor, art, science, philosophy, love, friendship, recreation — all that is in its degree expressive of intelligently satisfying human living. The distinction between the sacred and the secular can no longer be maintained.

EIGHTH: Religious Humanism considers the complete realization of human personality to be the end of man’s life and seeks its development and fulfillment in the here and now. This is the explanation of the humanist’s social passion.

NINTH: In the place of the old attitudes involved in worship and prayer the humanist finds his religious emotions expressed in a heightened sense of personal life and in a cooperative effort to promote social well-being.

TENTH: It follows that there will be no uniquely religious emotions and attitudes of the kind hitherto associated with belief in the supernatural.

ELEVENTH: Man will learn to face the crises of life in terms of his knowledge of their naturalness and probability. Reasonable and manly attitudes will be fostered by education and supported by custom. We assume that humanism will take the path of social and mental hygiene and discourage sentimental and unreal hopes and wishful thinking.

TWELFTH: Believing that religion must work increasingly for joy in living, religious humanists aim to foster the creative in man and to encourage achievements that add to the satisfactions of life.

THIRTEENTH: Religious humanism maintains that all associations and institutions exist for the fulfillment of human life. The intelligent evaluation, transformation, control, and direction of such associations and institutions with a view to the enhancement of human life is the purpose and program of humanism. Certainly religious institutions, their ritualistic forms, ecclesiastical methods, and communal activities must be reconstituted as rapidly as experience allows, in order to function effectively in the modern world.

FOURTEENTH: The humanists are firmly convinced that existing acquisitive and profit-motivated society has shown itself to be inadequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted. A socialized and cooperative economic order must be established to the end that the equitable distribution of the means of life be possible. The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good. Humanists demand a shared life in a shared world.

FIFTEENTH AND LAST: We assert that humanism will: (a) affirm life rather than deny it; (b) seek to elicit the possibilities of life, not flee from them; and (c) endeavor to establish the conditions of a satisfactory life for all, not merely for the few. By this positive morale and intention humanism will be guided, and from this perspective and alignment the techniques and efforts of humanism will flow.

So stand the theses of religious humanism. Though we consider the religious forms and ideas of our fathers no longer adequate, the quest for the good life is still the central task for mankind. Man is at last becoming aware that he alone is responsible for the realization of the world of his dreams, that he has within himself the power for its achievement. He must set intelligence and will to the task.

[EDITOR'S NOTE: There were 34 signers of this document, including Anton J. Carlson, John Dewey, John H. Dietrich, R. Lester Mondale, Charles Francis Potter, Curtis W. Reese, and Edwin H. Wilson.]

Copyright © 1973 by the American Humanist Association

Doethe above manifesto not remind you of Engels and our Prussian revolutionary theoretician Karl Marx?

I wanted to print the full manifesto lest it be said that I am blaspheming Richard Dawkins, now please notice the differences between his stance and their stance. and that they admit that they have a religion.

We have some resident geniuses who have so much evidence they cannot even say what it is.

Look if your elders and betters do not know what happened ? How can you even claim you have enough evidence to prove, let alone say, what happened?

My atheist friends you ae ideologues, you are driven by spirits the same spirits which cause Marxists to sell “Socialist Worker” newspaper on every high street in this land. The same spirit which leads a Jehovah’s Witness to wake up five o’clock on a Saturday morning and annoy people in their homes when they can be enjoying their weekends. The same spirit that leads Mormons to think they will one day become gods and wear magic underpants. The same spirit which leads British Israelis to claim that they are the ten lost tribes of Israel and sing about building a New Jerusalem on England’s green and pleasant land while working themselves into a fever.

We could all use this car, but we are not going to see it.  As long as there is an oil industry they will prevent this invention coming to the market.  You see all you Dawkinites, welcome to reality, science does not take place in a vacuum but in  geopolitics .  Car running on water threatens to make whole economies bankrupt .

Whatever you call yourself, I ask you to read a little bit of history and not from official textbooks and just start thinking independently.  I blame your parents for not educating about the state of the world. 

Next time be ye steady. Christians are not against technology as you are told, but there ate others who have the power to prevent scientific inventions, if it threatens their fat pockets.

If you are an inventor and you insist on not understanding economic realities, they will send their goons to make you understand English, big business has armies.  Call me a conspiracy theorists at least I refuse to be naive.