Politics Of Science
People there are cures to AIDS and Cancer but they are kept suppressed because they threaten to destroy the pharmaceutical industry.
I have been accused of being anti-science by some sections of the Atheist community. But I believe that science is a tool and it can be used for the good and for the bad. Science has no morals and cannot decide for itself how it will be used?
Science occurs in a given political and economic climate. In the video above I have included the works of “MR Oxygen” and how oxygen can Cancer and HIV and AIDS. But the pharmaceutical industry knows that these cures will put the virtually out of business and they have lobbied hard to stop these cures.
The logic is simplicity itself, disease cannot live in oxygen, it is anaroebic, expose it to oxygen and you kill the diseased cells.
You are so right when you claim that there are cures for AIDS and Cancer. As a matter of fact, there is a cure for AIDS that has been U.S. Patented since 1997. patent #5676977. I posted an article about this
http://freeyourmindonline.net/Blog/?p=4
I also talk about the US Patent to SPREAD the disease.
So if they will stop something that has been patented, then you KNOW they will suppress evidence of anything NON patented that they can’t make a lot of money off of. It’s a shame.
Matt
May 7, 2008 at 2:43 am
Simply astounding. This blogger will believe any idiocy as long as there’s a video about it.
You are simply foolish to believe for a moment the untested claims of these charlatans and conspiracy mongers. There is nothing more that can be said.
Of course, such undue credulity is unsurprising. The blogger has demonstrated nothing but unwarranted credulity since starting this silly blog.
I am still waiting, blogger, for you to answer one simple question, asked many times and still being ignored like a coward. How can you back up your claim about atheists and fear of death? If you can’t where is your admisson of error?
Mike
May 7, 2008 at 5:05 pm
No Mike this Is a Medical Doctor.
dawkinswatch
May 7, 2008 at 7:48 pm
Oh? Really?
Has he done clinical studies? Has he published? Has he done anything other then put the feeble-minded in danger with false promises in order to sell a book? Let’s see what 5 minutes research tells us. Ed McCabe “Mr. Oxygen” is not a doctor of medecine. He isn’t a doctor of anything. He has a degree in educational media. I get that from the site that hosts the video you put up. I looked through the site a bit. I note that Mr. Oxygen cites as the main source of his information the interviews he has done over the years? I see no reference to who he interviewed or what their qualifications are.
Nowhere in any of this man’s material did I find anything that did not smack of cheap snake-oil.
Blogger, you have fallen for yet another bill of goods. This is clear and shameful hucksterism. Shame on you for spreading it.
Mike
May 8, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Dawkinswatch, how many times do I have to ask you to justify your anti-thought position? The vast majority of philosophers and scientists agree that thought is a good thing. I don’t necessarily think that it is wrong for you to dissent from the pro-thought consensus, but I ask that you present some valid reasons for your position. I grant that this may be difficult; after all, how do you justify an anti-thought position without thinking in one way or anything? Nevertheless, I do not think that this difficult excuses you from rationally justifying your position. Like it or not, you must show us why thought is a bad thing.
J. Frantz
May 8, 2008 at 11:19 pm
Re, “how many times do I have to ask you to justify your anti-thought position?”
Just passing through here, and I feel like I’ve stumbled across a mugging in progress. In answer to the above question: How many times do you have to have a question declined to accept that someone isn’t blogging by *your* rules but their own?
Erudite Redneck
May 26, 2008 at 3:54 am
And how many times can a blogger be dead wrong and continue to refuse to address those who point it out?
Mike
June 21, 2008 at 7:59 pm