Dawkinswatch

Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

Forbidden Archeology Disproves Evolution.

with 13 comments

Well here we go again, archeologist have been burying evidence which challenge their ideology that man descended from monkeys.  Surprise! Surprise!

Man has existed side by side with animals which Darwinians believe man evolved from.

Everyone who knows that knowledge does not exist in a vacuum but reacts to the politics of the day.  For any archeologist to disgree with the theory of evolution, is to jeopardise his /her professional career.

I think this is proof that Evolution did not take place.

Even if they claim that that is not the case, it at least presents evidence of scientific  skullduggery.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Advertisements

Written by dawkinswatch

February 5, 2008 at 6:25 pm

Posted in Fraud

Tagged with , , , ,

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I’m surprised a Christian blogger would find a Hindu creationist idea convincing. Are you converting?

    Alun

    February 5, 2008 at 8:06 pm

  2. I am not converting, it is the evidence he uncovered which interests me.

    Micheal Cremo takes the dating techniques to be reliable, I do not and i believe that te biblical accout is true.

    dawkinswatch

    February 5, 2008 at 8:13 pm

  3. Who says that humans are descended from monkeys?
    Either that is a huge typo or the author of this article has no understanding of the Scientific Theory of Evolution.

    Matt

    February 5, 2008 at 9:12 pm

  4. Matt

    Should I have said from a rock? As you know that is what Evolution claimed we came from.

    dawkinswatch

    February 5, 2008 at 9:31 pm

  5. viruses and bacteria change and adapt all the time — look at the flu and these superbacteria.

    Why can’t it happen to other creatures as well?!

    Jersey

    February 5, 2008 at 10:04 pm

  6. Cremo’s evidence is based on Vedic scriptures. You may have heard him mention it in the video clips you posted. You’re saying that his work, which uses ancient Hindu texts, is reliable enough to be proof. Most Christians would say that the Bible is more accurate than the Vedas.

    Have you read Cremo’s books?

    Alun

    February 5, 2008 at 10:38 pm

  7. no he got the inspiration from them but he went out and saw what evidence is available.

    dawkinswatch

    February 5, 2008 at 10:40 pm

  8. A rock? What?
    Your understanding of evolution seems to be horribly lacking.

    Matt

    February 5, 2008 at 11:46 pm

  9. You haven’t read any of his books have you? You may find it helpful to visit his website at http://www.mcremo.com . You can read the introduction to Forbidden Archeology online at: http://www.harekrishna.com/col/books/science/intro.html

    I can’t find any substantial sections of Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin’s Theory online, but it does have a website if you Google for Human Devolution. It has quotes like “We did not evolve up from matter; instead we devolved, or came down, from the realm of pure consciousness, spirit.” Which to me sounds like an alternative to Darwin’s Theory based on the Vedas. If you read Genesis 2:7 you’ll see the Judaeo-Christian opinion is the opposite. The body came first fashioned from earth and then the God put a spirit in it.

    You’re welcome to believe the Vedas are an accurate and correct account of humanity’s past. Freedom of religion is important. Some people people think Jesus is another way of telling the tale of Krishna, but these people tend not to be Christians. I suppose it depends on how compelling you think the evidence for Hindu creationism is and how much, or how little, value you place on your previously Christian faith.

    Alun

    February 6, 2008 at 12:13 am

  10. You win the ‘Ignorant red-neck theist of the week’ award. Congratulations. Now go get a clue. Your ignorance of the things you mindlessly criticise is astounding.

    CJ22

    February 6, 2008 at 12:25 am

  11. Curse those clever archaeologists and their theory of EVILution!

    James

    February 6, 2008 at 12:59 am

  12. Archeologist never originated the Theory of evolution, please remember that it is a relatively new discipline.

    CJ22 I never thought of myself as a red neck but I will accept the award. Peace.

    dawkinswatch

    February 6, 2008 at 5:47 pm

  13. No the theory was originated in Greece (Ionia specifically- they come up with everything). It didn’t go far- they had no mechanism. It was revieved in the 18th and 19th century for some reason and Darwin, a biologist, as well as Wallace propesed the theory of “Desent by modification by Natural Selection”.

    Archelogists study ancient human cultures. You are refering to physical anthropoligists. The reason they didn’t origionate it is that Africa and the Rift Valley were “The Dark Continent”. This was 1859- you could explore Africa, but if the climate didn’t kill you, malaria would.

    Samuel Skinner

    February 6, 2008 at 7:06 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: