Dawkinswatch

Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

Dawkins: I Am Hostile To A Rival Ideology.

with 9 comments

Well just put Richard Dawkins in front of a camera and he will sap the energy out of every thinking Evolutionists.

What can I say, the man is now not going where the truth leads him and is limiting his enquiries to what fits his prejudices ? That cannot be good science Psychologists call it partial percelption but we laymen call it wishful thinking.  Wow!

The video is a preview of a documentary film and it asks why are Darwinians worried? You can lose your job for not folowing the dogma. 

Science, ladies and gentlemen happens not in a vacuum but has to fit in with the ideologies of foundations and companies which fund it.

Related to:https://dawkinswatch.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/forbidden-archeology-disproves-evolution/


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Advertisements

Written by dawkinswatch

February 8, 2008 at 3:04 pm

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Yeah- we fire flat Earthers too. They comlain about discrimination, but it is nothing we get compared to the eugenists when we discriminate against them.

    Samuel Skinner

    February 8, 2008 at 6:36 pm

  2. Samuel it is easy to disprove flat eathers and evolution, that is why they do not want rivals

    dawkinswatch

    February 8, 2008 at 7:43 pm

  3. Reason isn’t an ideology. Science isn’t an ideology. Christianity is an ideology.

    J. Frantz

    February 8, 2008 at 9:40 pm

  4. Easy to disprove evolution? Then do it already and stop spouting falsehoods and ignorance in every post on this blog of yours.

    Bring out the evidence, disprove it. Let’s actually see if your arguments disprove evolution or, as every other argument so far has, if they’ll be shot down in flames by people who actually know what they are talking about.

    But you have no evidence, do you? You are nothing more than a mouthpiece for the DI. And I think we all saw how ignorant even one of their leading ‘scientists’, Simmons, is in that recent radio debate he did against PZ Meyers.

    Even Behe, another supposed leading ID researcher, was absolutely torn to shreds because of his ignorance in the Denver court trial.

    Matt

    February 8, 2008 at 9:43 pm

  5. Wasn’t that debate a gas, Matt? A grizzly bear could have won that argument.

    J. Frantz

    February 8, 2008 at 10:11 pm

  6. I just watched the whole video in this post. The whole thing is based on one event in which a poorly-written article was published because it wasn’t properly peer-reviewed.

    J. Frantz

    February 8, 2008 at 10:27 pm

  7. What I am highlighting is that Science does not happen in a vaccum but poltics play a very important part in the process of where scence goes.

    The owners of journals decide what areas of inquiries are important. Every researcher wants to see their works published and that gives publishers the power to reject or include material.

    Iknow Academics who were employed as secretaries at Havard simply because say they were working in that institution would make publishing easier.

    dawkinswatch

    February 8, 2008 at 11:44 pm

  8. Politics plays a role in who gets funding. For example, stem cell researchers have not received sufficient funding because of superstitious (ie Christian) beliefs held by politicians. Politics plays little or no role, however, in the scientific debates that occur in journals and conferences.

    You just pointed out that journals specialize in particular topics. No shit; do you think there should be a “Journal of Cool Stuff”? Not that ‘intelligent design’ papers would even be accepted at that journal…

    J. Frantz

    February 8, 2008 at 11:51 pm

  9. It’s also not surprising at all that ID doesn’t make it into science journals simply because ID is not science.

    If the ID people want to go and make their own journal called “hypothesis we have no evidence for” then they are free to do so. But no respectable science journal would ever allow such articles and papers into their pages, simply because ID isn’t science.

    Matt

    February 9, 2008 at 12:08 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: