Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

10 Reasons Why Evolution Is a Lie: 1) Lack Of Scientific Tests

with 16 comments

We have established that most Evolutionist fanatics cannot describe the the process of evolution but they make boasts to be great rationalists, so this might be a little tricky.

Now there is something that is called the Scientic Method but if you look at the steps you will notice that Evolution cannot meet the criteria given that it cannot be tested.  Well it should be but then New Atheist will claim that you are anti-science.

The scientific method proves that evolution is bad science, please remember that you have not given us any proof of any fossil which is in-between species and the ones you have given us like Piltdown Man were frauds.

Some of you might do well to remember that you are claiming to be objective but you have long passed over to hooliganisms let alone fanatisms.


Written by dawkinswatch

July 3, 2008 at 5:44 pm

16 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Well, I missed my call. It wasn’t Hovind.

    It is still a pack of lies. Particularly despicable are the lies told by the contemptable fool who keeps this blog. He is a fool of no character, unless one counts his infernal deceptions as an example of bad character.

    Let’s go through them one at a time:

    “We have established that most Evolutionist fanatics cannot describe the the process of evolution…”

    This is of course untrue and unless he is a complete idiot, so does the blogger. One can only assume complete dishonesty. Such a description of process was provided to him by me yet he can’t acknowledge it.

    Next we have”

    “Now there is something that is called the Scientic Method but if you look at the steps you will notice that Evolution cannot meet the criteria given that it cannot be tested.”

    Again, a damnable lie or the simplicity of a damned moron. Take your pick. A search of only a few minutes found in the Oxford Journal of Integrative and Comparative Biology :

    “Functional Constraints on the Evolution of Larval Forms of Marine Invertebrates: Experimental and Comparative Evidence”


    What is the bottom line? This is one example of the mountain of experimental evidence for evolution. Try responding to this, blogger (you damned lying coward) rather then posting idiotic videos.

    As to the piltdown man, try to keep in mind (what little of a one you have) that it was not the efforts of arrogant fools who know nothing but think they know all (that would be you, blogger) but rather that of science that found and publicized that error. Science is an honest, self correcting process. Results are checked and verifoed independently.

    Next we have,

    “proof of any fossil which is in-between species…”

    All fossils are a species themselves and a transition between specie before and after.

    What is wrong with you blogger? What happened in you childhood or whenever that has made you so opposed to reason? To being an adult. Believeing in creationism is like believing in Santa. It is something for children that should be outgrown. There is no jolly old elf who brings presents and there is no sky daddy who will reward you and punish all the bad people who were mean to you.


    July 4, 2008 at 6:43 pm

    • Are we on our period =P Seriously you dont lsoe your temper over something this small


      August 12, 2010 at 4:56 pm

  2. I don’t really feel the need to debunk this. But one point is interesting. Analyze this tidbit:

    “The scientific method proves that evolution is bad science, please remember that you have not given us any proof of any fossil which is in-between species and the ones you have given us like Piltdown Man were frauds.”

    He uses the phrase “given us” twice, as though the scientific community must “present” the Christian community with reasons to accept evolution.

    Scientists are not required to convince Christians that evolution is correct. Scientists just do scientific research. They have discovered that evolution is true. If Christians don’t consider themselves part of that community, we shouldn’t be particularly shocked.

    J. Frantz

    July 5, 2008 at 1:09 am

  3. It’s also funny that they try and use the process of science to debunk evolution (and fail every time) when it is the process of sciehnce that came up with evolution.

    Come on, blogger, you can do btter then this. Be a man for the first time in your life and admit th etruth. Evolution is a fact. Come on, repeat after me, “Evolution is a fact”. You can do it, you know you want to, just repeat the following, “Evolution is a fact and I was an imbecile to think otherwise and a liar to claim otherwise.”

    You’ll feel better if you do it and you won’t have to steal silly videos to try and keep yourself convinced of this lie.


    July 5, 2008 at 3:01 am

    • Evolution is not a fact, it remains a theory, when was it tester, a theory must be tested to be proven a fact..isn’t thatna rule of the scientific community?

      If it has been please point me to the results?


      July 31, 2012 at 11:15 pm

  4. I mean these two need help.

    How do we test what ever new hair brain idea which is presented?
    This is an opportunity for you to give us proof but you have failed yet again.

    Mike you want to say that I expelled you because you were are great thinker, no the day you will be expelled will come because you are a hooligan. Can you not see that you are doing great harm to your own side?


    July 7, 2008 at 5:36 pm

  5. Calling you out fo rthe fool you are is not hooliganism, you simpleton (by the way, who bought you the word of the day toliet paper where you got a big word like “Hooligan”?) it is simply honesty. If you ban me it will be because you can’t answer anything I ask you. It will be because you are a caword and a fool.

    Next, my “side”? I have no side. There are merely those who are right (me and the rest of the rational, atheist world) and wrong (you and the rest of the theist, creationist world). There are those who listen and learn and those who don’t. There are those who think and those who do not. You are the latter in both those cases.

    A side note: Is English you rnative language? If not, I apologize for some of the things I have said about you, but if it is you should be ashamed of yourself for your ignorance.

    Finally, I provided just one example of experimantal evidence for evolution yet you ignore it and keep on yelling that none has been provided. Can you read? You keep putting up silly videos rather then even halfway decent sources of information. Follow the link I gave you. It’s right there, fool.

    Do you realize the deep, traumatic harm you could do to someone with your lies, blogger? A child might come along and read this idiocy and and be persuaded to go down in to your sickening, conspiracy-ridden, demon-haunted world. Shame on you.


    July 7, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    • My children also resort to name calling and bad language when they are cornered or can’t offer up any other facts.


      July 31, 2012 at 11:17 pm

  6. Oh, and I need no help of any kind, especially from the likes of you.

    Good point J. Frantz but I think we must accede that the majority of Christians accept the science, even if they have to do a few mental gymnastics to get there. It is only the saddest, most backward, most foolish, and most arrogantly vile of self-described Christians, the absolute worst of the lot (such as our blogger here) that are creationists.

    I have no problem with those types of Christians, the ones who don’t try and evangelize in the schools or post deceptive and offensive websites. It is the scum who try and put their stuff in the schools or out where the innocent or uneducated could see and be deceived that get my dander up. Thus my animosity for this blogger.


    July 7, 2008 at 6:07 pm

  7. Sometimes you just have to applaud. I love the idea of a Creationist using Karl Popper’s philosophy of science to attack evolution. Yup, the same Karl Popper who was open about his disbelief in Christianity in Skeptic magazine and the same Karl Popper who wrote Dialectica (32:344-346)

    I have changed my mind about the testability and logical status of the theory of natural selection; and I am glad to have an opportunity to make a recantation.

    I’ll admit I was suckered into thinking this was a genuine blog, but Dawkinswatch has a fantastic dry sense of humour. But it’s simply not possible to trawl through YouTube for the most awful dross without being capable of doing some basic searches. Ok, so it’s satire but he beautfully captures the sense of hate some fundamentalists display towards supposedly fellow Christians.

    I also loved the idea of using Adnan Oktar’s work earlier. The idea of using a Muslim fundamentalist who got WordPress blogs banned in Turkey to ‘prove’ a ‘Christian’ idea was inspired. I defy anyone to watch the video clip where Jesus makes the perpetual motion machine run on Holy Water without cracking up.

    If Dawkinswatch were serious he’d be frightening.


    July 7, 2008 at 6:26 pm

  8. Ok, I hope, I very much hope, that I have been well and truly had, taken in, hornswaggled and bamboozled. I really hope so.

    If that’s the case. I’ll cop to it. Mock me openly across the internet, blogger, if you have fooled me this completely. Hell, I’ll come to your favorite bar, anywhere in the world, and let you mock me to my face.

    However, I doubt it is fake. I really do, and I maintain the fact that it is harmful in anycase.

    Poe’s Law, baby. Know it, live it, love it:



    July 7, 2008 at 6:56 pm

  9. Check out this website and you’ll get some real science and real answers… http://www.icr.org


    July 27, 2008 at 4:40 am

  10. Once a devout evolutionist, I remain committed to scientific understanding.

    Through scientific understanding, I have lost faith in evolution. The lack of science behind evolution is akin to the lack of science behind anthropogenic global warming: dishonest politics of the Left. Unlike Leftists, science refuses to silence debate on unproven theories. Come on people, wake up (especially Mike, the angry man without evidence who parrots the party lines)!


    August 10, 2008 at 7:55 am

  11. Even this discussion is long over you should know that there is a great program on NOVA about Intelligent Design vs Evolution. Its Called Judgment Day it really shows you which side is better.

    In this program, NOVA captures the turmoil that tore apart the community of Dover, Pennsylvania in one of the latest battles over teaching evolution in public schools. Featuring trial reenactments based on court transcripts and interviews with key participants, including expert scientists and Dover parents, teachers, and town officials, “Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial” follows the celebrated federal case of Kitzmiller v. Dover School District. This two-hour special was coproduced with Paul G. Allen’s Vulcan Productions, Inc.


    September 23, 2008 at 9:54 pm

  12. O and the guy on the You tube video above does not completely know what he is talking about.


    September 23, 2008 at 10:07 pm

  13. any comments?


    June 19, 2009 at 7:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: