Dawkinswatch

Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

10 Reasons Why Evolution Is A Lie:2) Hybradisation Experinents Failure

with 22 comments

You know how they are so eloquent when they are talking about apes being 98 per cent human? You know how good they are telling the world that there is shape shifting, we were once frogs who begot giraffes who begot chimps who begot humans? Is this voodoo science ( do you remember voodoo economics?) or is based on solid laws?

We can test whether these men have lost their marbles or they are, what they dream, that they will one day become i.e. demigods.

Now if Evolution is true why is it that experiments to interbreed chimps and humans have failed? The scientific dictator Uncle Joseph Stalin commissioned Ilya Ivanov to produce strong men by interbreeding men and apes. If what what so called scientists claims were true that would have a walk in the park, but he failed to make the experiments work. I want to drive this point home again they failed to produce half a man and half a monkey.

I smell a rat, no half a rat half a frog. maybe a human being is not 98 per cent chimp after all and maybe evolution is just recycled reincarnation myth?

There you are, Stalin tested the theory of evolution claims but it was found wanting, it was exposed as a myth.

Advertisements

Written by dawkinswatch

July 9, 2008 at 1:00 pm

22 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Just came across this blog, funny stuff in a sad way.

    “…we were once frogs who begot giraffes who begot chimps who begot humans? Is this voodoo science ( do you remember voodoo economics?) or is based on solid laws?”
    Who says this? Have any sources?

    “Now if Evolution is true why isit that experiments to interbreed chimps and humans have failed?”
    Experiments like this have nothing to do with evolution.

    “The scientific dictator Uncle Joseph Stalin…”
    I didn’t know he was scientific, what exactly was Stalin’s background in science?

    I don’t think you understand or even try to understand evolutionary theory, although I suspect countless times people have attempted to help you out in your ignorance.

    Nobody

    July 9, 2008 at 4:56 pm

  2. “Now if Evolution is true why is it that experiments to interbreed chimps and humans have failed? The scientific dictator Uncle Joseph Stalin commissioned Ilya Ivanov to produce strong men by interbreeding men and apes. If what what so called scientists claims were true that would have a walk in the park, but he failed to make the experiments work. I want to drive this point home again they failed to produce half a man and half a monkey.”

    So, since chimpanzees can’t produce offspring with humans, evolution is false?

    Wow. Woweewowwowwow.

    J. Frantz

    July 10, 2008 at 12:11 am

  3. Evolutionary theory specifically states that you CAN’T inter-breed different species.
    However, you can, for example, breed a horse and a donkey (creating a mule). So what, is that undeniable proof that evolution is true?

    Mike

    July 13, 2008 at 5:13 pm

  4. One word: Strawman.

    Go take a remedial biology class so that you know what you’re talking about.

    Have a nice day.

    splendidelles

    July 14, 2008 at 12:40 am

  5. BUWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA!

    This is some brilliant satire. I mean truly…

    What? He’s serious? For real?

    Holy hell!

    Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water….

    XanderG

    July 14, 2008 at 6:34 pm

  6. Pardon me for posting this random comment but I could not find a “contact us” type of link and I wanted to get in touch with “Dawkinswatch.”
    I am a contributor to one of the blogs in your roll and wanted have a word with your.
    Please email me when you get a chance.
    aDios,
    Mariano

    Mariano

    July 15, 2008 at 4:22 am

  7. WOW! Unbelievable. I can’t believe one of my blog entries got linked to this bollocks! You have a complete lack of knowledge about evolution or biology.

    The reason chimps and humans can’t breed together is because there’s still a lot of evolutionary distance between humans and chimps. They may be our closest living relative, but that’s only because all the closer ones are extinct by natural selection. Try much closer relatives like different species of horse, etc, and you’ll find it does work.

    grammarking

    July 15, 2008 at 11:39 am

  8. Hey Dawkinswatch,
    Way to answer the questions and rebuttals to your strange post! It’s been over a week and…nothing. I would really like to know what “the scientific dictator” Stalin’s background was in science. Did he get his background in it before or after he attended seminary school? I’d also like to know where the “frogs who begot giraffes who begot chimps who begot humans” came from. It’s certainly not anything to do with the theory of evolution, yet you use it like it was – what is it some sort of creationist thing? (rhetorical question, of course it is)

    Nobody

    July 17, 2008 at 1:49 am

  9. I’ll believe this whole “humans evolving from apes” crap when someone can dig up the fossils of a half-ape half-human species and verifies it. That part of evolution is straight bull crap. Since when did science become a more valid explanation for the existence of mankind than the Bible? I’m no saint, but I’m pretty sold on that whole “creation story” that’s in the book of Genesis. Humans just “were”. No amount of science can ABSOLUTELY verify the evolution theory. Science can get a little out of hand every now and then, but that’s completely comprehensible.

    Nick

    July 28, 2008 at 4:11 am

  10. Nick,

    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/

    Have a nice read!

    Nobody

    July 28, 2008 at 4:19 pm

  11. I totaly agree with the previous comment. i have three points
    1. we did not arise from frog and giraffes, we share common ancestors with them that divereged into the species we see today.
    2. ofcourse chimps cant interbrteed with humans because our genomes have changesd due to evolution. You seem to get the impression that if we arose from chimps we can somehow still interbreed with them. we arose from them by having are genoms modified. thats evolution genotypic frequencies changing over time. So we have modified chimps genes because of evolution 0.o therefore our we cannot produce viable ofspring because of two different coding mechanisms of our genes. It makes complete sense. IF we shared the same genes as chimps we could interbreed but we have modified ones BECAUSE of evolution.
    3. Evolution does not discredit god. EVolution just suggests that species can change over time. WE ourselves have changed many speicies of dogs and plants in the history of humanity. That is a form of evolution. We still witness evolution around the world, its just simply a change in a species. Evolution does not explain how species aros it just says they can change. Quite simply 0.o We have never found any fosils of domestic cats more than 1.0million years back suggesting they wherent there at that time. We found found fossils of bacteria dating far back as 2.7billion year suggesting they where there at that time. How do you somehow get the impression this suggests there is no god. BEFORE YOU DISCREDIT SOMETHING BE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND IT.

    thisisfunny

    October 9, 2008 at 5:05 pm

  12. just one more thing i have to say because it so astonishing that some people just like to discredit loads if research and evidence. Quite simple you prvide an explination that has no evidence whatso ever and then you would like to discredit a scientific theory that is widly accepted and supported by 100s of years of reaserch (some of which comes b4 darwins time). No one asks you to believe in evolution, you may even reguard it as a mere tool to explain what we see. But b4 anyone tries to discredit it they should atleast based there remarks and factual and solid evidence not on simple premisses they estime to be true.

    thisisfunny

    October 9, 2008 at 5:12 pm

  13. You are a fucking retard sir. You do not deserve the brain with which you were born and you should do the human race a favor by killing yourself and hopefully you’re inferior genes will not be passed down

    Joseph Stalin

    December 18, 2008 at 5:12 pm

  14. Come on fellas horses and donkeys are with in the same genetic group and now that genetics have been tested on a so called missing link and the scientific genetics test show no possible genetics capable of inter breeding give up you fantasy of evolution as real science and put it in the same category as miracle wonder drugs foisted of in the 1800’s from traveling salesmen. It is not science at all it is not repeatable, replicable or disproveable, there has never been a successful scientific experiment under lab conditions that created anything other than dirty test tubes. Lets call a hoax a hoax and grow up as scientists and live by the scientific rules. Or call evolution the religion of the age of reason and treat as a religion but please as a scientist do not call it science.

    dante

    February 22, 2009 at 4:36 am

  15. Tell me one thing please, why are there other species on earth other than humans, because survival of the fitest means exactly what it states, survival of the fitest. So if one is looking from an evolutionists point of view: The strongest grass survived and then evolved into a shrub, the strongest shrub evolved into a small tree and so on. If that is true there shouldnt be any grass, trees or animals left, just humans, and another thing, why did it stop with humans?

    Just a thought

    Jonathan

    May 5, 2009 at 4:14 pm

  16. Tell me one thing please, why are there other species on earth other than humans, because survival of the fitest means exactly what it states, survival of the fitest. So if one is looking from an evolutionists point of view: The strongest grass survived and then evolved into a shrub, the strongest shrub evolved into a small tree and so on. If that is true there shouldnt be any grass, trees or animals left, just humans, and another thing, why did it stop with humans?

    Just a thought

    Jonathan

    May 5, 2009 at 4:14 pm

  17. Tell me one thing please, why are there other species on earth other than humans, because survival of the fitest means exactly what it states, survival of the fitest. So if one is looking from an evolutionists point of view: The strongest grass survived and then evolved into a shrub, the strongest shrub evolved into a small tree and so on. If that is true there shouldnt be any grass, trees or animals left, just humans, and another thing, why did it stop with humans?

    Just a thought

    Jonathan

    May 5, 2009 at 4:14 pm

  18. Tell me one thing please, why are there other species on earth other than humans, because survival of the fitest means exactly what it states, survival of the fitest. So if one is looking from an evolutionists point of view: The strongest grass survived and then evolved into a shrub, the strongest shrub evolved into a small tree and so on. If that is true there shouldnt be any grass, trees or animals left, just humans, and another thing, why did it stop with humans?

    Just a thought

    Jonathan

    May 5, 2009 at 4:14 pm

  19. Tell me one thing please, why are there other species on earth other than humans, because survival of the fitest means exactly what it states, survival of the fitest. So if one is looking from an evolutionists point of view: The strongest grass survived and then evolved into a shrub, the strongest shrub evolved into a small tree and so on. If that is true there shouldnt be any grass, trees or animals left, just humans, and another thing, why did it stop with humans?

    Just a thought

    Jonathan

    May 5, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    • hey good thinking there 🙂 I also play with the idea that if life consisted only in the “organic matter” discovering the best way to survive, there would be in the least only 1 of each species… or?

      Faith

      November 12, 2010 at 3:41 pm

  20. http://library.thinkquest.org/27407/creation/fail.htm

    People have a strange idea about the creation theory. Actually evolutionists love to misinterpret it. Read the arguments on this website and try to explain all the discrepancies of the evolution theory… if you can. I lost my trust in the evolution theory a LONG time ago.

    Faith

    November 12, 2010 at 3:38 pm

  21. I did a science course in university, and there are three statements that stood out that were enough to make me reject evolution altogether. They were: 1) Scientific observations are very much subjective, 2) A scientific theory can never be proven conclusively true and 3) Evidence that support Darwin’s theory of natural selection is largely circumstantial. In light of this, I ask the question: why is is that evolutionists hold on their theory as a solid, concrete, irrefutable fact? Is it that they would rather believe a lie than accept the existence of a God who created the universe? Also, why is not yet called “The Law of Evolution”?

    Beliver in creation

    December 15, 2010 at 2:18 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: