Dawkinswatch

Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

Fossil Evidence For Evolution: Nebraska Man Hesperopithecus haroldcookii

with 13 comments

How Reliable is Fossil Evidence for Evolution? Nebraska Man

I am beginning to love the various Apemen, this time we have an incident of Hesperopithecus haroldcookii, or Nebraska Man, who was touted as the missing link betwewen man and the apes and evidence for Evolution but was not really.

I love to see how exited the evolutionist camp gets, they find a tooth and they imagine the whole race! But then find that the tooth was a pig’s tooth. We have already seen how the Piltdown Man was a made up too. Now if I were an Evolutionist, I would stop my fellow travellers from hyping fossil evidence as proof of evolutio,n but you know that they are very desperate to prove their non existent case for evolution, that is why they cannot help themselves.

I love the quote in the video ” Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups” Good and effective rhetoric right there. I might use that one.

I will be shoting a few videos for Youtube in the coming weeks, just to replace Venom Fang X, who has run into difficulty with the Muslims, even though he cannibalised Atheiset on a regular basis.

Advertisements

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Piltdown man was a deliberate hoax, while “Nebraska man” was a mistake. A mistake that was quickly recognized, and a retraction was made IN 1927. The early identification, as for any fragmentary fossil, was tentative. It was the press that went nuts with it and started publishing illustrations, not the researchers.

    Bipedal Tetrapod

    May 26, 2009 at 12:22 pm

  2. It’s really annoying when idiots like Dawkinswatch bring up “Nebraska man” and “Piltdown man” and other similar examples of nonsense, in a lying attempt to pretend that that’s all there was.

    Sorry Dawkinswatch, ignoring the list of hominid fossils only makes you IGNORANT.

    Try discussing some of these:

    Sahelanthropus tchadensis
    Ardipithecus ramidus
    Australopithecus anamensis
    Australopithecus afarensis
    Kenyanthropus platyops
    Australopithecus africanus
    Australopithecus garhi
    Australopithecus aethiopicus
    Australopithecus robustus
    Australopithecus boisei
    Homo habilis
    Homo georgicus
    Homo erectus
    Homo ergaster
    Homo antecessor
    Homo heidelbergensis
    Homo neanderthalensis
    Homo floresiensis
    Homo sapiens

    Dan

    May 26, 2009 at 12:54 pm

  3. Well what about the museums? Do they still have the Apemen up when we have never been shown evidence of them being true?

    dawkinswatch

    May 26, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    • *Smacks forehead repeatedly*

      No evidence, except maybe for Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo floresiensis.
      But apart from that…

      Bipedal Tetrapod

      May 26, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    • Not true? You mean you don’t think that they’re really fossils? Or maybe you mean that fossils were put there by Satan!

      LOL You idiot.

      Dan

      May 27, 2009 at 6:32 am

  4. Bipedal Tetrapod

    It is called blinding by science it is a logic trick.

    dawkinswatch

    May 27, 2009 at 11:33 am

    • Hominid fossils are a logic trick? What, you mean some sort of test sent by Satan, right? That’s just an excuse to ignore them, i.e. remain ignorant.

      Dan

      May 27, 2009 at 11:42 am

    • Illuminating by science. It does involve logic, but it is not a trick.

      Bipedal Tetrapod

      May 28, 2009 at 2:55 am

  5. […] to dismiss them, their history of finding missing links is abysmal, they always get it wrong from Nebraska Man to Pildown Man via Peking man, we have to run after them because they never fail to embrass […]

  6. […] should be taught Evolution as a given, rather than have a creation science versus evolution debate. Evolution relies on indoctriantion rather than the laws of science and the sweet science of […]

  7. Very good article reports why evolution can’t be true:

    http://koti.phnet.fi/elohim/evolutionofman.html

    telson

    June 30, 2009 at 5:40 am

    • Except in his first paragraph he says:
      They suppose that beings like man have been on the Earth for hundreds of thousands of years, in spite of the historical evidence showing that the history of the mankind does not reach more than approximately 5,000 years to the past.
      Which is just plain wrong. For starters, look up:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jericho#Ancient_times

      Bipedal Tetrapod

      July 13, 2009 at 12:51 am

  8. […] Besides everytime they claim to have Ape men we should run towards them, they will hit you with a pig’s tooth and from there they will conjure up a Nebraska Man.n […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: