~~Rob Bell Mars Hill and The Emergent Heresy
Rob Bell Mars Hill and The Emergent Heresy
My policy is to expose the likes of Rob Bell and the emergent or even the Emergent village. They believe in Evolution as much as the Atheist and they are quick to use Darwin to mock Christianity.
Is the emerging church a cult? Yes only because they ask their members not to listen to criticism. Every cult from the Mormans to the Jehovah’s Witnesses tell their people not to listen to others. it is amazing the guy calls us pharisees because we think he is the Trojan horse who are is there to destroy christianity.
Look Rob Bell and the bellious I will take any opportunity to debate your cult. I am not a coward , what makes you think we are scared of you?
He says he is orthodox this man has made tearing apart the bible a speciality.
Related to:
Emerging Church and Rick Warren
Dawkinswatch 
Look Rob Bell and the bellious I will take any opportunity to debate your cult. I am not a coward , what makes you think we are scared of you?
Is that your new strategy, to puff your chest out and act like a tough guy?
Dan
June 10, 2009 at 9:13 am
No the guy said we are cowards just because we think he is a snake in the pulpit.
dawkinswatch
June 10, 2009 at 3:21 pm
And you took the bait, didn’t you?
Dan
June 10, 2009 at 5:03 pm
[…] ~~Rob Bell Mars Hill and The Emergent Heresy […]
Tony Campolo Red Letter Christianity The Emerging Churches Apostacy « Dawkinswatch
June 10, 2009 at 7:48 pm
[…] Rob Bell and the Emergence […]
Phyllis Tickle, The Emerging Church and The Church Of England « Dawkinswatch
June 12, 2009 at 8:37 pm
[…] Rob Bell And the Emerging church Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Theistic Evolution: Is it a Cop out?The Antichrist Signs and the Emerging ChurchRick Warren And The Emerging Church DeceptionTheistic Evolution […]
Theistic Evolution and The Emerging Church: Are You Saved « Dawkinswatch
July 11, 2009 at 6:18 pm
[…] Rob Bell Apostacy Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Phyllis Tickle, The Emerging Church and The Church Of EnglandPlease Prove Me WrongTony Campolo Taxes, Abortion and EcumenismLimited Atonement […]
|>|>|>Church Of England Episcopolian church and The Emerging heresy « Dawkinswatch
August 7, 2009 at 7:30 pm
Kind of forgot about this, to take the modernist philosopher named Hegel who taught the immanance of God(God in everything) and then adopt this in the emerging church-I just sometimes wander how you can take every teaching of liberal modernism and rename them(Spark of God in every man and incarnational)and then apply the modernist tag to fundamentalism not because of certainty of fact but certainty of faith is taken and lied about saying this certainty is about the first principles self evident or supposed-factual certainty and apply to faith certainty-BTW-which one byou think the bible teaches-faith or facts?
BY the way, have no problem debatimg postemergent philosophers-name the place-perhaps an online community some where?
David Emme
March 16, 2010 at 3:26 pm
well, this is what i have noticed0If you are a fundamentalist-it is perfectly okie dookie for amergent philosophers to bring any accusation against fundamentalism not founded on no evidance as well as just showing how fundamentalism believes and teaches what they say it does with the actual words penned, spoken, preached by a fundamentalist preacher/Pastor
I am just astonished at the hypocrisy from emergent philosophers to lambast any group and then go crying about pushback from the same who claim fundamentalism.
If I remember correctly, in Proverbs, it teaches if you generate strife you will recieve strife or as taught by Paul-you reap what you sew.
Of course, saying Bell and others do not call out people by name-fundamentalist is a name claimed by many.
So, let me restate-when you can say whatever you want without speaking of spoecific people but criticize a movement and others criticize by name which was commanded by Pau in Romans to mark them which carry not our doctrine and have absolutely nothing to do with them-the biblical madate is not to not criticize or to never take the teachings of a pastor, book, church, and/or movement and test the spirits-compare it to the word of God.
So, have a public ministry, write books, make dvd’s on your teachings and sell them online whereever christians sale christian material and Christian bookstores. So as in all of this some if not a lot dare to follow the mandates nof the scriptures to take his teachings and compare them to the bible as commanded biblically as well as a part of the book of Jude teaching to earnetly contend for the faith-in otherwords, emergent postmodern philosophers as Bell can criticize and teach against what ever he desires and bemoaning it happening to him-me -awefully high and mighty to lift your words and teachings equal to the actions and words of Christ by defining this as blasphemy-I am fairly sure some will see this as hypocrisy and hold his ministry, books, videos, church, and sermons to the same standard he expects of people criticizing him.
The end point of all this-HOW DARE YOU!
David Emme
March 16, 2010 at 3:15 pm
It’s convenient for people not to believe in Jesus, the Son of God, one doesnt have to stay strong in the Christian Faith,Christian Beliefs, just do good you’ll go to Heaven. The Holy Bible clearly states, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son (Jesus), that whosoever Believes in Him will not perish, but have Everlasting Life.” John 3:16, 17. We know that in End Times ther will be false prophets. I just hope people will question, and come to know the truth through The Holy Bible. I also Pray Mr. Bell will come to the realization, He is Leading Many Astray, and that will rest on His shoulders, when He Stands Before God.
kays
March 11, 2011 at 3:12 pm
WOW!… May the Lord straighten him out quickly.
Michael D. Shoesmith
April 4, 2011 at 11:58 pm