Dawkinswatch

Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

Fossil Evidence For Evolution

with 2 comments

Fossil Evidence For Evolution or Foolishness

I thought sicience was about finding the evidence first ,then t then drawing a conclusion but this is not what is taking place with our friends in the Evolution camp. Evolution is a religion as we have demostrated time and again.

They talk always of Fossil Evidence but that does not prove anything, how do you prove that the bone in the dirt is a father of anything?

Besides everytime they claim to have Ape men we should run towards them, they will hit you with a pig’s tooth and from there they will conjure up a Nebraska Man.n

A pig tooth was enough fossil evidence to draw a Nebraska man. Some scientific method.

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “I thought sicience was about finding the evidence first them looking first then drawing a solution but ethis is not what is taking place with our friends in the Evolution camp.”

    First, learn to spell.
    Second, learn proper word usage.
    Third, know what you are writing about before you write about it.
    The scientific method used by the “Evolution camp” is a well-recognized and well-defined series of steps used to acquire an explanation for observed phenomena. A preliminary generalization, or hypothesis, is formed on the basis of careful observation of the phenomenon being studied. This hypothesis is then tested by further observations and experiments. If the information gathered from observations and experiments over time satisfies the conditions of the hypothesis, the hypothesis eventually becomes accepted as a scientific theory. Although they continue to argue over the details of exactly how the various mechanisms of evolution operate, biologists long ago concluded that evolution happens. This is because evolution explains all of the evidence far better than all other proposed explanations for the origin of life.

    “They talk always of Fiossil Evidence but that does not prove anything, how do you prove that the bone in the dirt is a father of anything?”

    You’re right, it could have been a mother of something, or it could have not produced any offspring at all.
    Using Kent Hovind (he’s not a Doctor by the way) is one of the best ways to get people to question Creationism.

    Nobody

    July 14, 2009 at 1:23 am

  2. “A pig tooth was enough fossil evidence to draw a Nebraska man. Some scientific method”

    DW,
    The first two comments (sent by Dan and Bipedal) on your own silly link you provide should have explained some things and set you straight. What about the hundreds of legitimate finds? Using Nebraska Man as an example is just plain stupid – but that seems to be a trend with you.

    Nobody

    July 15, 2009 at 10:13 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: