Dawkinswatch

Exposing Evolution As A Mess and Atheism As Hot-Air!

Kent Hovind: Evolution is Stupid

with 36 comments

As a continuation of the the beatdown of Nobody who is an evolution mystic, I have noticed that he is not very clear what Evolution is.

Dr Kent Hovind, really breaks down what evolution is starting with the big bang, a theory coming from Catholic mystic Lamaitre. No he was not only a Catholic mystic but one of the sons ofLoyolla. They should be called the Society of Lucifer because those guys are the enemies of all life on planet earth.

There you are the Jesuits are responsible for the Big Bang theory, that is a problem for evolutionist, because the dictionary definition for a jesuit is a hypocrite.

Written by dawkinswatch

December 11, 2009 at 3:17 pm

36 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Evolution and the Big Bang are different things you idiot. One relates to biology and the other to astronomy. But apparently you are too stupid to tell the difference between an animal and a star.

    Dan

    December 11, 2009 at 4:43 pm

  2. Using Hovind as a resource?
    Wow, two morons for the price of one.

    Nobody

    December 11, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    • > Using Hovind as a resource?
      > Wow, two morons for the price of one.

      The argument that always works (well, almost always)–ridicule.

      Dr. Phil: How’s that working for you?

      Nobody: Works every time–until some wise guy notices I really haven’t said anything.

      Morgan

      June 17, 2011 at 3:43 am

  3. “I have noticed that he is not very clear what Evolution is.”

    I was perfectly clear, you must be talking about Hovind.

    Oh by the way, Hovind is not a Doctor.

    Nobody

    December 11, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    • And you aren’t anyone as far as I’m concerned.😛

      break your heart

      March 2, 2012 at 1:44 am

  4. well then please describe the begging of evolution for us?

    Nothing evoled into nothing? is that it?

    dawkinswatchwatch

    December 12, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    • Life from life, with modifications is evolution, it has nothing to do with evolving from nothing.

      Nobody

      December 12, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    • dawkinswatchwatch: I STRONGLY AGREE WITH YOU.

      break your heart

      March 2, 2012 at 1:45 am

  5. You guys cannot even argue, an argument is based on an assertion supported by facts.

    Prejudice or hatred is not a valid argument.

    Contain your feeelings and use rationale, to support what you have to say.

    dawkinswatchwatch

    December 12, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    • Where are we displaying either prejudice or hatred? We just know a bit of biology, and are pointing out that you obviously don’t know enough about science (to say nothing of biology in particular) to hold up even the vague resemblance of an intelligent conversation.

      It’s just like a science teacher giving a student Failing grades on exams for someone who doesn’t know the first thing about science.

      Dan

      December 14, 2009 at 7:23 am

  6. “You guys cannot even argue, an argument is based on an assertion supported by facts.”

    There are more facts supporting evolution that any alternative. You have been given loads of facts yet have provided absolutely zero to support your beliefs.

    “Prejudice or hatred is not a valid argument.”

    Then why do you use them?

    Nobody

    December 12, 2009 at 7:09 pm

  7. Dan

    December 14, 2009 at 2:12 pm

  8. There are more holes in the evolution theory then a fish net.

    What facts are there to prove the religion called evolution.

    dawkinswatchwatch

    December 14, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    • Okay, name one.

      You’ve yet to display that you actually know what evolution is, so how you claim to know that there are any holes in it is astounding.

      You can’t even correctly define evolution, for one.

      Dan

      December 14, 2009 at 7:36 pm

      • Watch out Dan, he will bring back Hovind!

        Nobody

        December 14, 2009 at 10:34 pm

  9. Hovind of the fake “PhD” he bought for $50? Hovind the “science teacher” whose only “teaching” was at child molesting Sunday School? Hovind the pathologicaal liar? You really should read his “disertation” – comic gold, but standard fundy…

    You have:
    Identical genes for a tail to chimpanzees, but switched off by mutation.
    Identical “broken” vitamin C genetics to chimpanzees
    Identical ERVs to chimpanzees
    Chromosome 2 iis an exact fusion of two chimpanzee chromosomes

    All with exactly the divergence predicted by evolutionary biology…Either you share a recent ancestor with chimpanzees and are a deluuded idiot, or youur God decieves – massively for no reason….

    cloudsrider

    December 16, 2009 at 1:53 am

  10. I have always given you prove, so you want proof of creation? I have proof, great proof.

    Now when I give you proof will you go and sulk in the corner?

    Plus you also suffer from the same disease that Hitchens and Dawkins suffer from, lack of philosophical rigour. Hsve ever studied philosophy?

    dawkinswatch

    December 16, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    • Hsve ever studied philosophy?

      I highly doubt that. Your knowledge of the philosophy of knowledge and epistemology are completely non-existent. The only philosophy you might know is the philosophy of religion – a worthless study not grounded in reality but revelatory hallucinations.

      Dan

      December 17, 2009 at 7:22 am

    • If you could actually provide proof, we would not sulk. That’s what you don’t seem to get. We accept the evidence (which all points to evolution), so
      if you could miraculusly produce a rigorous scientific argument disproving evolution, and proving special creation, then we would have to accept that, wouldn’t we?
      But then, given that you rely on Hovind for your knowledge (or lack thereof) of evolution, this is hardly likely.

      Bipedal Tetrapod

      December 21, 2009 at 1:20 am

      • If you could actually provide proof, we would not sulk.

        He has given us proof of something however – that he is ignorant as to what evolution actually IS.

        Dan

        December 21, 2009 at 7:55 am

  11. you are the one who needed a textbook definition of Evolution.

    dawkinswatchwatch

    December 28, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    • Yet you, DW, never provided a “textbook definition” and despite everyone’s attempts to tell you what evolution is you are too brainwashed (or just stupid) to understand.

      Not that it will do any good, but here is another attempt…and it’s FROM A TEXTBOOK!

      “Biological evolution … is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are inheritable via the genetic material from one generation to the next. Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest protoorganism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions.”
      – Douglas J. Futuyma in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates 1986

      Got it?

      BROTHER EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED IN THE REAL WORLD.

      Nobody

      December 28, 2009 at 10:35 pm

      • “BROTHER EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED IN THE REAL WORLD.”

        I didn’t write that!

        Nobody

        January 8, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    • HA!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAJHA

      Can you even cite a textbook on evolutionary biology?

      Have you even come close to addressing (much less refuting) something that could correctly be called evolution?

      No, and no.

      You’re a bleepin’ idiot with an IQ of a child.

      Dan

      December 29, 2009 at 8:47 am

  12. What is scary is that i am beginning to seee you are not sure what evolution is.

    you not looking like your brother is not evidence for evolution.

    dawkinswatch

    January 8, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    • Dan is right, “You’re a bleepin’ idiot with an IQ of a child.”

      Nobody

      January 8, 2010 at 11:36 pm

      • Actually I may have to modify that. I’m beginning to think he’s a bleepin’ illiterate idiot. The use of speech-recognition software would explain all the horrible typos that suggest he doesn’t know how to spell. And being illiterate would explain why he’s barely able to comprehend our replies.

        Dan

        January 9, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    • LOL No, we’ve seen you argue against things that you call “evolution,” but none of your posts argues against what evolution ACTUALLY is.

      Nice try, idiot.

      ~Dan

      Dan

      January 9, 2010 at 12:12 pm

  13. Nonody I challenge you to an IQ contest, plus how many degrees do you have?

    dawkinswatch

    February 5, 2010 at 12:00 am

    • And what would YOU score on an IQ test? I’m guessing generously that you’d be in the 75-80 range.

      Dan

      February 5, 2010 at 7:16 am

  14. You can barely compose a sentence, your reading comprehension is almost zero, you can’t carry on a decent debate, (still waiting for your answers by the way) yet you want to challenge someone to an IQ test?That would be a waste of time.

    Who the hell is nonody?

    Nobody

    February 5, 2010 at 12:51 pm

  15. Yes that is your new name, you huff and puff but I have shown on numerous occasssions that ou are lacking in your knowledge of history, current events and common sense.

    dawkinswatch

    February 7, 2010 at 12:08 am

    • … but I have shown on numerous occasssions that ou are lacking in your knowledge of history, current events and common sense.

      No you idiot. All you’ve shown is that you know little of history and science, and you’re living in a fantasy world.

      Dan

      February 7, 2010 at 8:53 am

  16. Awww poor DW, is that all you can come up with?

    “Yes that is your new name”

    Why because you hit the ’n’ instead of the ‘b’ and you’re too stupid to know better?

    “…you huff and puff”

    Huff and puff? When? That is a lie. Usually I’m trying to correct your misinformation and bad writing, then I ask questions which you usually don’t (or can’t) answer.

    “…but I have shown on numerous occasssions that ou are lacking in your knowledge of history, current events and common sense.”

    Another lie. You are delusional. You really should seek some help.

    P.S. I’m still waiting for your alternative to evolution and evidence to support your alternative.

    Nobody

    February 7, 2010 at 3:49 am

  17. They r a disgrace 2 or community we need 2 get rid of them

    neo

    January 3, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    • This is hilarious! I’m so glad I found this blog! It’s fascinating to see how the mind of a conspiracy theorist works when he tries to express himself in a language that is obviously not his first…Can’t understand why he’s using English rather than his native language, which I’m guessing is Chinese….

      Dan

      October 22, 2012 at 6:19 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: