~~~~Climategate:Long term Temparature charts
~~~~~~~~Climategate:Global Warimg Hoax
This is the chart theyr do not want you to see because it reveals who they are and the lies they tell.
global warming and global cooling
There are people who want to giv e us short term chart and they then think that is enough to scare us into binding treaties.
Please bring your “A” game please, you must believe we are morons to try silly tricks with us.
Global warming mongers will like us to believe that temperatures will rise forever which is stupid and mendacious. Temperatures have undulated over time and that is why they are going down and this present time.
Dawkinswatch 
FYI, Cliff Harris studied insurance law, and is not a climatologist. Randy Mann is a TV weather man. Again, not a climatologist.
Their graph indicates NO SOURCES OF DATA. In other words, they made it up.
Bipedal Tetrapod
January 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm
The Medieval warm period was at it’s peak comparable to the mid-20th century, before the slight dip in the 1950s-1970s, and significantly less than now. What is the source of this chart anyway? “http://We-hate-science.com”?
Here’s something that’s more accurate (Figure 6.10b (IPCC4, WG1):
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 5:02 pm
they simply charted it themselves,
dawkinswatch
January 11, 2010 at 5:36 pm
Based on what? It looks like a cheap and inaccurate sketch.
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 5:43 pm
Here’s another, covering the last 2000 years. Note how it lacks any resemblance to the Harris-Mann chart whatsoever.
Here’s a hint – when a graph has only one axis, there is something wrong.
Bipedal Tetrapod
January 11, 2010 at 6:03 pm
Sorry, here’s the link:
Bipedal Tetrapod
January 11, 2010 at 6:05 pm
look you guys are drunk, you have extrapolated the chart and exaggerate.
dawkinswatch
January 11, 2010 at 8:12 pm
No that would be you, using the exaggerated chart that was drawn by a couple of guys who probably know jack shit about climatology.
The charts we’ve linked to can be traced back to ACTUAL measurements made by QUALIFIED climatologists.
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 8:51 pm
You want actual measurements by real climatologists?
http://migration.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/paleoclimate-reconstructions/
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 9:10 pm
Based on tree-rings to reconstruct past temperatures:
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 9:10 pm
Based on bore-holes to reconstruct past temperatures:
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Based on glacial retreat over the past 400 years:
http://migration.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/oerlemans_2005_fig3a.png?w=250&h=163
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Based on a mix of methods to reconstruct past temperatures:
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 9:12 pm
Which is more correct? Hard to say. Here’s putting the most reliable few onto the same chart to get a better idea of past temperatures:
However you measure it, no reconstructions of past temperatures look like the piece of trash you’ve shown us DW.
Dan
January 11, 2010 at 9:14 pm
dan you are a lost soul, what point are you tryint to prove?
Look temparatures are have not gone up forever as the world wild fund crowd and oxfam and other busy bosies want us to believe.
Temparatures are have been falling for the past 10 years but the numbers are being doctored to “bind” the world into crazy agreements.
besides, carbon dioxide is food for plants, so we could boost food production by increasing carbon dioxide emissions.
dawkinswatch
January 11, 2010 at 9:15 pm
“…we could boost food production by increasing carbon dioxide emissions.”
I know you have been told this before, but you are an idiot.
Nobody
January 11, 2010 at 10:15 pm
Look temparatures are have not gone up forever as the world wild fund crowd and oxfam and other busy bosies want us to believe.
“are have not”? Learn to write you illiterate idiot.
“Temparatures are have been falling for the past 10 years but the numbers are being doctored to “bind” the world into crazy agreements.”
Learn to read and write. Jeez. Temperatures have not been falling for the past ten years you moron. Stop lying.
“besides, carbon dioxide is food for plants, so we could boost food production by increasing carbon dioxide emissions.”
Maybe if the global mean surface temp. increased by only 1C. Our best models all show that it could be 4 times that.
And so what? That’s not relevant here. What is relevant is that without CO2 the Earth would be a frozen shell of a planet. With less CO2 we’d be colder, and with more CO2 we’d be warmer. Thus, if we continue adding CO2, it’ll get warmer, and it’ll be anthropogenic because WE added it.
Dan
January 12, 2010 at 7:18 am
is carbon dioxide not food for plants?
dawkinswatch
January 12, 2010 at 12:55 am
So? What does that have to do with temperature?
Without CO2 the Earth would be a frozen shell of a planet. Look at the planet Mercury, despite the fact that the planet is so close to the sun, and rotates every 90 minutes, temperature drops 900F from the light to dark sides of the planet. The heat isn’t retained by the planet, with no carbon-based atmosphere.
With less CO2 we’d be colder, and with more CO2 we’d be warmer. Thus, if we continue adding CO2, it’ll get warmer, and it’ll be anthropogenic because WE added it.
Dan
January 12, 2010 at 7:21 am
the workld has been getting colder, for the fast ten years with rising carbon dioxide, so the correlation is not there.
It is voodoo science, no it is political science.
dawkinswatchwatch
January 27, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Stop lying.
Dan
January 27, 2010 at 3:02 pm